Well, in a new Wall Street Journal Tech Live interview, Phil Spencer gave his most clear-cut answer yet. It seems the current plan is to treat Call of Duty similarly to another major cross-platform franchise bought back in the day, Minecraft (thanks to CNET’s Ian Sherr for the transcription). “When we acquired [Minecraft] it was on I think 12 platforms and now it’s on like 22 platforms. Our intent is to treat Call of Duty very similar to the way we’ve treated Minecraft.” Spencer also clarified that he still sees games like Starfield and Elder Scrolls as more traditional exclusives, in line with Mario and Zelda for Nintendo. Of course, in Phil Spencer’s ideal world, Call of Duty may be one of those exclusives, but regulators and his own bosses who want to maximize profits may not look too kindly on locking the series down. Speaking of the Activision Blizzard sale, Spencer still expects it to go through, but the process is remains ongoing. Activision Blizzard has faced a series of lawsuits and other legal action on the heels of a suit filed by California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) alleging widespread gender-based discrimination and sexual harassment at the Call of Duty publisher. You can get more details on that unfolding story here. What do you think? Is Microsoft making the right choice by giving Call of Duty the Minecraft treatment? Or should they be using it as a wedge for their larger ambitions?
